10/08/2010

Malaysia Energy Option - part 2

Currently in Malaysia there is a lack of available competitive and sustainable alternative energy sources for the long term. At the moment we rely heavily on gas, oil, hydro and coal for our energy. As prices for gas and oil increases, so does the operating cost that will be burdened by the utilities companies. The same goes for coal, as our country import over 90% of its coal from other country such as Australia and Indonesia. Yet, coal seems unable to meet with the nation's ever increasing demand for electricity. Because of this, we need to enhance our national energy security due to depleting indigenous resources. We also need to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions.

That's where nuclear energy comes in. Among the key point of nuclear power is the nuclear fuel is energy intensive. Also nuclear power refueling cycle is between 12 to 24 months. Which means that the nuclear plants can be operated without interruption for a few years. Also not to mention that nuclear power plant has zero carbon emission. This will go a long way in solving the world's CO2 emission problem.

It can be observed that countries with higher Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and energy consumption per capita than Malaysia have gone for nuclear power. But also some countries with lower GDP and energy consumption per capita than our country are thinking of nuclear power.

22 comments:

  1. The import export of fuel resources still can continue as that field is one of the most profitable. As nuclear and professional skills to operate the whole thing need some time to mature. No pressure should be put on people working on nuclear power as it is not easy as people think it is to manage a nuclear power plant and it is not cheap.

    ANG JIT YONG (ME083530)
    aplox3@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. I strongly agree with ang jit yong. The chase for the usage of nuclear power should not be hasty. As everyone is well aware that nuclear power is a very powerful source of energy. If Malaysia doesnt take baby steps and mature in the usage of power plant,personally i think they should not go after the usage of this power. Lets just hope that Malaysia can do more in the future!

    Govinderan Mageswaran
    ME083544
    ninemoons_firing@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think what the government will do is choose a group of people and send them training/work at an existing nuclear power plant.

    This way when our nuclear plant is up and running we'll already have individuals capable of running it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. and also import some foreigners to work in the plant just in case :p

    ReplyDelete
  5. The government choose people for training/work at another existing power plant is a good idea, after a period of time, we will b able to have our very own professionals rather than depending on people from other country to run our nuclear power plant.

    Mohd Ehsan Bin Chik Hisham
    CE082151
    m_ehsan55@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. what does it mean by refueling cycle is between 12 to 24 months?explain please.
    Nuclear energy will reduce the Co2 emmision ,but how to solve the problem,for the disposal of nuclear waste?

    Kumaran a/l Somasundram
    kmrn_siva@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree the problem that have been planned to solve using neclear plants but then if our country
    reduce import of some raw material like coal,so there is some problem can be happen in some industry using coal.

    Sathis Kumar s/o Kanesan
    sinkansen_19@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  8. With the current technology, nuclear waste or used fuel can be turn back into fuel. The waste can be recycle back. So we don't have to worry about the fuel supply for the reactor.

    I think refueling cycle depends on type of reactor and what kind of fuel pellet used. Think of it as some reactor use less concentration of fuel (for example u-235) so they need to put in new fuel rods as the fuel decays and used up.

    Note that there are reactors that doesn't need to be refueled at all.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What are the types of control rods used and what are their purposes in the nuclear reactor?

    DINESH(ME083537)
    united_hiphop1@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  10. Shim rods are used to control and extract reactivity in sufficient amount. While regulating rods serves a purpose and to maintain desired power or temperature.lastly Safety rods provide a means for very fast shutdown in the event of an unsafe condition.

    DARSHAN AL NAMASIVAYAM (ME083535)
    darshan.bigd@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  11. According to a source,control rods are referred to black absorbers and grey absorbers.What are the diffrences between these absorbers?

    GULSHANJIT SINGH(ME083709)
    shanjitscsa@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  12. salam n hye.. i must agree that nowdays malaysia need to find new renewable and sustainable energy in order to replace old energies that nearly to extinction. but is it nuclear energy the only energy that we can looking for? can somebody help me answering this question...

    HAZIM BIN SHARUDIN
    sena_90@yahoo.com.my

    ReplyDelete
  13. I have no idea about the grey and black absorbers. Maybe it turns black when it need to be replaces? :p

    ReplyDelete
  14. For the time being nuclear energy seems to be most economical and environmental friendly choice. It is the best energy supplement so far.

    That is not to say that renewable energy will be abandon. It will still be developed. Maybe one day the whole world will run on solar and wind. It's interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  15. In my opinion, changing to nuclear energy would be costly for now as Malaysia would need to hire skilled professionals from other countries. Nuclear energy should wait until Malaysia is capable of training professionals to work in our own nuclear power plants. Malaysians studying nuclear would also need to get some experience by working in nuclear power plants in other countries.

    YANG GUO XIAN (ME083672)
    iainygx@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  16. well, Malaysia must now move on to get more specialised profesional in order steady the plan of nucleur usage. Goverment must now start to spend their money in sending more individuals to get proper knowledge in using the nucleur plan as well as the way in order to dispose nucleur waste. As the life in Malaysia getting more globalised, the usage of other energy increases. Therefore it is must for the government to move to another alternative. even they could bring professional to malaysia in order to teach and coach individuals here. It may not be cheap but tinking of Malaysia's future, it is a must..

    NANTHAR A/L PERREMAL
    ME083607
    nanthar_chelsea@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  17. It is obvious that going nuclear brings a lot of benefit to our country but as what my friends above has said, the initial cost will be very high. If there were more experts in Malaysia in this field, I would support this plan as nuclear fuel is very reliable.

    JAN SIONG LIM
    ME083552
    jansionglim@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  18. For me,it is something worth to start working on another alternative power;nuclear as the power source because we had been relying on heavily subsidised gas price to keep electricity rates low.Even the Petronas has warned,that the supply for gas would be uncertain by 2019,so?clearly,by that time, If the country wants to continue using gas, it will have to import at much higher international prices, which means that electricity prices will have to rise as well.The
    nuclear power stations are often built on the coast, and use sea water for cooling the steam ready to be pumped round again and maybe Malaysia can build at sabah or sarawak..

    FARID ASNAWI BIN AHMAD
    ME081809
    nawi_fender@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  19. Malaysia should have nuclear power stations. Renewable energy usage will be reduce. Nuclear power generation does emit relatively low amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2). The emissions of green house gases and therefore the contribution of nuclear power plants to global warming is therefore relatively little.This technology is readily available, it does not have to be developed first. For nuclear power, it is possible to generate a high amount of electrical energy in one single plant.

    FATIN NORAIN BT AHMAD SABRI
    ME083981
    fna_90@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  20. At the time of writing, nuclear energy accounted for more than two-thirds of submissions, with those in favour and those against in equal numbers. Solar energy was the second most popular comment category, with biomass and wind in third and fourth positions.
    All this suggests to me that feelings on which energy source is best are mixed overall and confirms that we have further to go before implementing a decision on nuclear energy.

    MUHAMMAD SADIQ BIN MOHD ANIPAH
    ME083602
    realphatslim@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  21. I want to share a testimony on how mr benjamin helped me with loan of 2,000,000.00 USD to finance my marijuana farm project , I'm very grateful and i promised to share this legit funding company to anyone looking for way to expand his or her business project.the company is funding company. Anyone seeking for finance support should contact them on lfdsloans@outlook.com Mr Benjamin is also on whatsapp +1-989-394-3740 to make things easy for any applicant. 

    ReplyDelete